Cited by 595Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil erosion and sediment transportSoil and Environmental Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DYNAMICS OF SOIL NITROGEN AND CARBON ACCUMULATION FOR 61 YEARS AFTER AGRICULTURAL ABANDONMENT

Abstract

We used two independent methods to determine the dynamics of soil carbon and nitrogen following abandonment of agricultural fields on a Minnesota sand plain. First, we used a chronosequence of 19 fields abandoned from 1927 to 1982 to infer soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics. Second, we directly observed dynamics of carbon and nitrogen over a 12-yr period in 1900 permanent plots in these fields. These observed dynamics were used in a differential equation model to predict soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics. The two methods yielded similar results. Resampling the 1900 plots showed that the rates of accumulation of nitrogen and carbon over 12 yr depended on ambient carbon and nitrogen levels in the soil, with rates of accumulation declining at higher carbon and nitrogen levels. A dynamic model fitted to the observed rates of change predicted logistic dynamics for nitrogen and carbon accumulation. On average, agricultural practices resulted in a 75% loss of soil nitrogen and an 89% loss of soil carbon at the time of abandonment. Recovery to 95% of the preagricultural levels is predicted to require 180 yr for nitrogen and 230 yr for carbon. This model accurately predicted the soil carbon, nitrogen, and carbon:nitrogen ratio patterns observed in the chronosequence of old fields, suggesting that the chronosequence may be indicative of actual changes in soil carbon and nitrogen. Our results suggest that the rate of carbon accumulation was controlled by the rate of nitrogen accumulation, which in turn depended on atmospheric nitrogen deposition and symbiotic nitrogen fixation by legumes. Our data support the hypothesis that these abandoned fields initially retain essentially all nitrogen and have a closed nitrogen cycle. Multiple regression suggests that vegetation composition had a significant influence on the rates of accumulation of both nitrogen and carbon; legumes increased these rates, and C3 grasses and forbs decreased them. C4 grasses increased the C:N ratio of the soil organic matter and thereby increased the rate of carbon accumulation, but not nitrogen accumulation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[0088:dosnac]2.0.co;2

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 72 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 595

Metadata

Authors
Knops, J. M. H., & Tilman, D.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-01
Volume
81
Issue
1
Pages
88-98
ISSN
0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2108520349
Cited by
595
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 35
FWCI
22.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ecology (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil and Environmental Studies
Keywords
soil carbon accumulation, soil nitrogen accumulation, agricultural abandonment, old field, chronosequence, soil C:N ratio, nitrogen deposition, symbiotic nitrogen fixation, Fabaceae, C3 and C4 grasses, floristic composition, soil organic matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DYNAMICS OF SOIL NITROGEN AND CARBON ACCUMULATION FOR 61 YEARS AFTER AGRICULTURAL ABANDONMENT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081%5B0088:dosnac%5D2.0.co;2
The paper
Knops, J. M. H., & Tilman, D. (2000). DYNAMICS OF SOIL NITROGEN AND CARBON ACCUMULATION FOR 61 YEARS AFTER AGRICULTURAL ABANDONMENT. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081%5B0088%3Adosnac%5D2.0.co%3B2